Looks good enough to eat...? |
Truth is a philosophical question, not a scientific one... |
If you believe that there is no God, all of your theories,
ideas, perspectives of life/creation, and understandings line up in accordance
with your “theology” (or lack thereof). You can’t accurately write from the
perspective of a theist because in your mind they’re irrational. The only way to
understand their perspective would be to start believing in a God but then you
wouldn’t be an atheist anymore!
Objectivity in this case would be the line between believing
in God and not believing in God... now what is that exactly? You either believe
in Yahweh or you don’t. For those who do, everything changes. For those who
deny His existence, everything changes. The two positions are at odds with one
another so there can be no common ground.
For the Christian, God’s word is the only objective truth.
If science says one thing but God’s word says something different, science is
wrong (as it has been in the past and will be in the future). But that’s
another conversation for another time.
The wisdom of this world is foolishness to God. His Word is
not illogical and won’t appear to be so unless we approach it with faulty
logic.
No comments:
Post a Comment